Bug #936
Smuxi uses regulary 100% CPU for a short time
| Status: | Closed | Start: | 01/08/2014 | |
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assigned to: |  Mirco Bauer |
% Done: | 100% |
|
| Category: | Engine | |||
| Target version: | 1.0 | |||
| Complexity: | Found in Version: | Git Commit be5b05a1f3 |
||
| Votes: | 0 |
Description
Somewhere inbetween the commits 106bbeb30f and be5b05a1f3 (master) was something introduced that causes smuxi to use the cpu at 100%.
I'm using a local engine, so dunno if it's the server at fault or the frontend
History
Updated by Lex Black 3979 days ago
Additional notes:
The problem gets more vivid the longer smuxi is running.
Cycling through the channels with ctrl+tab is sluggish.
Updated by Lex Black 3978 days ago
Lex Black wrote:
Additional notes:
The problem gets more vivid the longer smuxi is running.Cycling through the channels with ctrl+tab is sluggish.
It's case about the join/quit messages. Altough it's fixed with b9b5eaa the issue is most likely solved by accident (and somehow similar to the nicklist resize)
Running /benchmark_message_builder -c 1000 -t -m produces following results:
Bad build:
builder.AppendMessage() builder.AppendText() count: 1000 took: 1841 ms avg: 1,84 ms
builder.AppendMessage() builder.AppendText() count: 1000 took: 2013 ms avg: 2,01 ms
builder.AppendMessage() builder.AppendText() count: 1000 took: 1808 ms avg: 1,81 ms
builder.AppendMessage() builder.AppendText() count: 1000 took: 1824 ms avg: 1,82 ms
builder.AppendMessage() builder.AppendText() count: 1000 took: 2164 ms avg: 2,16 ms
builder.AppendMessage() builder.AppendText() count: 1000 took: 1822 ms avg: 1,82 ms
builder.AppendMessage() builder.AppendText() count: 1000 took: 1813 ms avg: 1,81 ms
builder.AppendMessage() builder.AppendText() count: 1000 took: 2098 ms avg: 2,10 ms
Good Build:
builder.AppendMessage() builder.AppendText() count: 1000 took: 174 ms avg: 0,17 ms
builder.AppendMessage() builder.AppendText() count: 1000 took: 174 ms avg: 0,17 ms
builder.AppendMessage() builder.AppendText() count: 1000 took: 176 ms avg: 0,18 ms
builder.AppendMessage() builder.AppendText() count: 1000 took: 181 ms avg: 0,18 ms
builder.AppendMessage() builder.AppendText() count: 1000 took: 171 ms avg: 0,17 ms
builder.AppendMessage() builder.AppendText() count: 1000 took: 169 ms avg: 0,17 ms
builder.AppendMessage() builder.AppendText() count: 1000 took: 176 ms avg: 0,18 ms
builder.AppendMessage() builder.AppendText() count: 1000 took: 173 ms avg: 0,17 ms
builder.AppendMessage() builder.AppendText() count: 1000 took: 172 ms avg: 0,17 ms
builder.AppendMessage() builder.AppendText() count: 1000 took: 176 ms avg: 0,18 ms
builder.AppendMessage() builder.AppendText() count: 1000 took: 174 ms avg: 0,17 ms
Updated by Mirco Bauer 3944 days ago
- Status changed from New to Feedback
Is this issue gone with latest HEAD?
Updated by Mirco Bauer 3944 days ago
I think it was potentially fixed in b9b5eaab869c9648a4d9c976cc8a36856ae02f92
Updated by Mirco Bauer 3491 days ago
Please try Smuxi 1.0~rc3 and tell me if the issue has gone away or not.
Updated by Lex Black 3490 days ago
I even forgot that I opened this bugreport (That long is this a non-issue now)
But cannot tell when it was gone.
But this can be closed
Updated by Mirco Bauer 3484 days ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Thank you very much for the feedback! I am going to close this ticket now then.