Bug #1046
Channel list in 1.0-rc2 is a lot more squished.
| Status: | New | Start: | 04/30/2015 | |
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assigned to: |  Georgi Karavasilev |
% Done: | 0% |
|
| Category: | Frontend GNOME | |||
| Target version: | - | |||
| Complexity: | Found in Version: | |||
| Votes: | 0 |
Description
See this. http://imgur.com/SOfwWJe
In particular, look at the #puppet, and #puppetboard channels.
This wouldn't be nearly as bad if resizing the channel list panel would actually save, or could be configured. But any changes to that size get lost if I move smuxi window.
Running on Win8.1 on both computers.
- 0.11-rc5 on the left.
- 1.0-rc2 on the right.
Both are being started via mono
- `"C:\Program Files (x86)\Mono\bin\mono.exe" "C:\Program Files (x86)\Smuxi\smuxi-frontend-gnome.exe"`
History
Updated by Mirco Bauer 3527 days ago
Pleas provide your monitor resolution. Smuxi is calculating the best width best on your Window size / monitor size (if in maximized mode).
Updated by Mirco Bauer 3527 days ago
- Category set to Frontend GNOME
- Assigned to set to Georgi Karavasilev
Updated by Mirco Bauer 3527 days ago
@Georgi: I think we need to revert the algo to the old width-ratio because the new message counter column steels some visible space. Maybe a character based width approach is better? Say so that at least 12 characters are visible. Because some people seem to use huge font sizes but the font size is not included in the width algo at all. What do you think?
Updated by Chris Francy 3526 days ago
The resolution and sizes of the two Windows are the following.
older 0.11 (on a 1650 x 1050)
Width = 1562
Heigth = 775
1.0 (on a 1920 x 1080
Width = 1635
Heigth = 841